Benjamin
BANNEKER
Parents & Family of Benjamin BANNEKER
Parents of Benjamin BANNEKER
Grandparents of Benjamin BANNEKER
portrait (above) from biography
Occupation
Recorded occupation: published almanacs from 1792-1797
Spouses, Marriages & Children of Benjamin BANNEKER
Add a life event, census record, military record, obituary, achievement, or photograph for Benjamin BANNEKER.
Life & Records
Photos, life events, and historical records for Benjamin BANNEKER.
Records about Benjamin BANNEKER and family appear alongside historical events from the same years. Each item is labeled so you can quickly tell family records from historical context.
Use these buttons to focus on the ancestor's own records or the wider historical context.
9 November 1731
Ellicott's Mills, Crown Colony of Maryland
About this genealogy record
Explore Benjamin BANNEKER's Family & History
View charts and other tools for this ancestor and family.
Prior to 1788 - Crown Colony of Maryland
April 28, 1788 - Maryland becomes 7th U.S. state
Not the ancestor you were looking for?
Search for another person or explore genealogy by place.
Search for a Person by Name
Enter as much of the name as you know. Last name is required.
Search by Place
Enter a place and choose a match from the suggestions.
Continue Researching Benjamin Banneker
Search other genealogy websites using this ancestor's known name, dates, and places.
Sign in to open targeted searches for this ancestor on Find a Grave, FamilySearch, and other collections.
New to GreenerPasture? Joining is free.Gifts & Resources Related to Ellicott's Mills, Maryland
Explore local-history books, genealogy resources, and gifts connected with this ancestor's birthplace and family-history research.
Genealogy Gifts from Our Shop
Browse a few family-history favorites, or visit the shop to see the full collection.






Questions, Corrections & New Information
Ask a question or share a correction, source, or new detail about Benjamin BANNEKER.
When possible, include names, dates, places, and sources so the information is easier to verify.