Spouses, Marriages & Children of Jacques BAUCHE (BAUCHER) (BAUCHET)
No spouse or marriage relationships are recorded yet.
When a spouse or partner is added, marriage details and children will appear in this section.
RESEARCH CONTEXT
Québec Genealogy Notes
Helpful background for understanding names and places that may appear in Jacques's Québec records.
Québec Place Names Through History
Québec has been described by several names during different periods of its history. Knowing the period name can make older records easier to recognize.
Have another record or photo? Add a life event, census record, military record, obituary, achievement, or photograph for Jacques BAUCHE (BAUCHER) (BAUCHET).
Life & Records
Photos, life events, and historical records for Jacques BAUCHE (BAUCHER) (BAUCHET).
How to read this timeline
Records about Jacques BAUCHE (BAUCHER) (BAUCHET) and family appear alongside historical events from the same years. Each item is labeled so you can quickly tell family records from historical context.
Show:
Use these buttons to focus on the ancestor's own records or the wider historical context.
1662
Name: Jacques Bauchet Gender: Male baptism/ christening date: 04 May 1662 baptism/ christening Place: Château-Richer, Montmorency No 1, Quebec Birth Date: 01 May 1662 birthPlace: Chateau Richer, Montmorency, Quebec Death Date: name note: Race: White father's Name: Guillaume Bauchet father's birthPlace: father's Age: mother's Name: Marie Paradis mother's birthPlace: mother's Age: indexing project (batch) number: C02776-5 system origin: Canada-EASy source Film Number: 1018161 reference number: P 7
'Canada, Births and Baptisms, 1661-1959,' index, FamilySearch (familysearch.org/ pal:/ MM9.1.1/ F2C2-2ZQ : accessed 03 Jan 2013), Jacques Bauchet, 01 May 1662; citing reference P 7, FHL microfilm 1018161.
Questions, Corrections & New Information
Ask a question or share a correction, source, or new detail about Jacques BAUCHE (BAUCHER) (BAUCHET).
When possible, include names, dates, places, and sources so the information is easier to verify.