GREENERPASTURE Free Family History Since 1999

flag female ancestor  Hannah  BRIGGS

Parents & Family of Hannah BRIGGS

Explore parents, grandparents, spouses, children, and the family connections surrounding Hannah BRIGGS.

Grandparents
Spouse & Children


Born: abt. 1701 in Easton, Province of Massachusetts Bay

Maternal grandparents: John FIELD , Elizabeth EVERDEN


Spouse(s)/Partner(s) and Child(ren):

Hannah  married  John SEALEY 12 January 1724 in Norton, Province of Massachusetts Bay .  The couple had (at least) 3 children.
John SEALEY  was born 10 April 1697 in Bridgewater, Massachusetts, USA.  John died 3 December 1783 in Easton, Massachusetts, USA.  John was the child of Edward SEALEY and Elizabeth WASHBURN.

Hannah BRIGGS died 16 February 1760 in Easton, Province of Massachusetts Bay.



Daughter of Clement Briggs and Elizabeth Field

Details of the family tree of Hannah appear below.

Spouse & Children of Hannah BRIGGS

Hannah BRIGGS married flag male ancestor John SEALEY
Marriage date: 12 January 1724
Marriage place: Norton, Province of Massachusetts Bay
John SEALEY was the child of Edward SEALEY and Elizabeth WASHBURN

Marriage notes:
Name: John Silley
Spouse's Name: Hannah Briggs
Event Date: 12 Jan 1724
Event Place: Norton, Bristol, Massachusetts
Indexing Project (Batch) Number: I01316-6 , System Origin: Massachusetts-EASy , GS Film number: 899107 , Reference ID: Vol 1, p 21
Massachusetts, Marriages, 1695-1910

Children of John SEALEY and Hannah BRIGGS



Add Life Event
Have another record or photo?
Add a life event, census record, military record, obituary, achievement, or photograph for Hannah BRIGGS.


Life & Records

Photos, life events, and historical records for Hannah BRIGGS.

How to read this timeline
Records about Hannah BRIGGS and family appear alongside historical events from the same years. Each item is labeled so you can quickly tell family records from historical context.
marriage1724 Marriage / Partner
Hannah BRIGGS and John SEALEY 12 January 1724 , Norton, Massachusetts, USA
1727 Birth of Child
Hannah SEELY was born 22 February 1727, Easton, Massachusetts, USA
1733 Birth of Child
Nathan SEELY was born 3 June 1733, Easton, Massachusetts, USA
1739 Birth of Child
Thankful SEELY was born 13 June 1739, Easton, Massachusetts, USA
DeathDeath — 1760
16 February 1760
Easton, Province of Massachusetts Bay
RECORD HISTORY

Record added: 9/22/2014 3:34:53 PM
Last updated: 12/11/2024 10:39:08 PM

MORE WAYS TO EXPLORE

Explore Hannah BRIGGS's Family & History

View charts and other tools for this ancestor and family.

Did You Know?The name 'Massachusetts' originates with native Americans in the Massachusetts Bay area (from the language of the Algonquian nation). The name translates roughly as 'at or about the great hill.' (statesymbolsusa.org)

1620 - 1627 - Plymouth Colony, New England
1628 - 1686 - Massachusetts Bay Colony
1686 - 1689 - Dominion of New England
1689 - 1692 - Massachusetts Bay Colony
1692 - 1775 - Province of Massachusetts Bay
1776 - 1788 - Crown Colony of Massachusetts Bay
February 6, 1788 - Massachusetts becomes 6th U.S. state

BIRTHPLACE

Explore Hannah BRIGGS's Birthplace

Explore the birthplace and related genealogy.

Easton, Province of Massachusetts Bay

KEEP SEARCHING

Not the ancestor you were looking for?

Search for another person or explore genealogy by place.

Search for a Person by Name

Enter as much of the name as you know.

Search by Place

Enter a place and choose a match from the suggestions.


RESEARCH ON OTHER SITES

Continue Researching Hannah Briggs

Search other genealogy websites using this ancestor's known name, dates, and places.

GENEALOGY GIFTS & RESOURCES

Gifts & Resources Related to Easton, Massachusetts

Explore local-history books, genealogy resources, and gifts connected with this ancestor's birthplace and family-history research.

DISCUSSION & CORRECTIONS

Questions, Corrections & New Information

Ask a question or share a correction, source, or new detail about Hannah BRIGGS.

When possible, include names, dates, places, and sources so the information is easier to verify.